It’s just not fair!
Throughout
this week, I have found myself pondering over one topic, more than any other:
the inequality of schools. The inequality of different schools in our country
has been a topic of some great discussions, both inside and outside of the
classroom. Last night, I was perseverating on this topic so much that one of my
classmates, in an attempt to get me off the subject finally said “Okay, Kappa
Kappa Kathy for President! Saving America one school at a time!” (She thought
that was a good nickname for me, since I am getting to be an honorary Kappa
member this summer by “house’ sitting at a sorority.)
Although,
she did shut me up for the moment, it has not stopped me from thinking about
this. In my school district there is a distinct difference between the schools
that have and the schools that have not. Yet, it is the same tax dollars
supporting all the schools in the district. I realize that the money raised by
the PTA can be vastly different from one school to another, but I am talking
about facilities, not the extras that a PTA can provide. I am currently working
at arguably the nicest middle school in my district, so this is not me whining
about how someone else has it better. This is also not about which school has
recently been renovated, because the last to be renovated is still the one with
the worst facilities.
Although
recently remodeled, the “ghetto” school, as the kids like to call it, has a
gymnasium and locker rooms that are over 60 years old. As are the library,
lockers, bathrooms, and cafeteria. (Not quite the complete remodel that we had thought
would happen) The number of student computers is half of what my current school
has, and the field behind their school is smaller than my parent’s yard. Not to
mention the lack of books in the library. What makes all of this so frustrating
to me is that the kids who go to the subpar school, are the ones who can’t
afford to have computers or books at home. So, the ones who have so little, are
being put at a huge disadvantage academically. The largest travesty is the
message we are sending them about their place in the world, and how we are
helping to shape the way they feel about themselves.
I understand that the worst facility in the
district that I work in is far above schools in other areas of the country, not
to mention inner cities. I use this only as an example of a bigger issue that I
believe is prevalent in America today, and I believe is not only hurting kids;
it is hurting the future of our country as well. (Who knows how many inventors,
engineers and scientists we are losing before they even get started?) Kids take
their cues from the adults around them. What are we telling students of lower
socio –economic status, when we give them less than the wealthy kids at school?
We are telling them that we do not value them as much. I can’t help thinking
about how debilitating that would be, if that was the message you received from
society… especially if that is the message you receive at home as well!
Perhaps addressing the academic
disparage between the lower income and upper income, and often times race, was
the point behind NCLB. But throwing more standards and tests at the problem is
NOT the answer. That only seems to throw gas on the fire. In my opinion, the
answer lies in finding a way to level the playing the field, so that all
students have a fair opportunity to getting a solid education. That does not
necessarily mean spend more money, just being very thoughtful in how money is
distributed.
Every time I have a student say, “That is not fair!” (Sometimes in
response to a student getting a slightly altered assignment) I tell them that
fair is everyone getting what they need to be successful, not everyone getting
the same thing. Today, in the United States, many kids of lower socio-economic status are
not getting what they need, while kids who have a more affluent background are
getting more then they need. And to that I loudly say, “It’s not fair!”
Just my very
opinionated thoughts….
Kathy McGrath
Now when I actually think about it, because I never really have before, there is the same “ghetto” school in my town. Okay, maybe I am oblivious to some things, but then I believe I have been “seeing” them the same way everyone else has. I equated it to this school is older, our community has grown, we built new to accommodate, older got face lifts and technologies as their infrastructure would permit.
ReplyDeleteBut as I look through the eyes of an educator and just view staffing issues, I whole heartedly agree there is a disparity between the quality of education provided at the various schools. Now that we have done some modifications to our schools: freshmen moved to the high schools and realigning to two middle schools that are feeders directly to them, closure of a junior high to facilitate the merge, new charter high school; a light has been beamed directly on the disproportion.
All of the high quality teachers that were at the junior high, now middle school, where my children are zoned, have moved to the new and exciting, state of the art charter high school where their talents are so desired and they are appreciated. All of the teachers they could not promote out of their positions as educators to the district office, now “teach” at the realigned middle school, because the building they were at is now the home of the charter high school. Needless to say, I am not letting my youngest attend next year; we’re sending him to a private school.
Okay, so why does education promote up rather than fire? I see it all of the time in government, too.
We are fortunate in my school to have an incredibly funded, well organized PTA interested in social justice. One of the things they fund is called the Viking Vault. Any student who needs schools supplies clothes, a flash drive, etc can simply go to the office and request access to the vault. The poor kids use the resource, and the rich kids support it. Last year the student body in conjunction with the PTA raised $5000 for the vault. At the end of the day though, I agree with you that the system needs to change. Less privileged students getting supplies and a decent education shouldn't be left up to chance or the benevolent whims of the wealthy.
ReplyDeleteI see this a one of the most important distinctions between our educational model and the others we have studied. What you described on the macro level even happens at the micro level. Individual students who struggle and need the highest quality instruction to find success are instead pulled out by an often untrained paraprofessional for their academic support. the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
ReplyDelete