Country Comparisons Blog
So far in Flat World, Linda Darling-Hammond has
painted a picture of national despair.
The U.S.
is failing because of our culturally diverse nation, desire for a more relaxes
teaching atmosphere, too many standardized tests and our lacking teaching
professionalism. Is this “fair”? As an American teacher and product of the
American educational system, I would say no.
I take pride in being a teacher who was taught by and teaches in the
system. This does not mean that there is
not room for improvement.
The suggestions hinted at by Hammond
are to:
1) Give more “Professionalism” to American Teachers
2) Understand that high stakes testing that is tied to
performance and pay is not highly motivating, instead is distressing
3) Help teachers to become better before they graduate from
college and then continue their education post graduation
What can I do with this information? I cannot change an entire institution or
educational system. Instead I have to
find the little thing that can be influenced by a rural Idaho
teacher. There are suggestions that a teacher can make 1) relevant
opportunities for professional development 2) strong curriculum and course
suggestions that are not teaching to a test but increasing the critical thinking
and higher order questioning skills of our students. Teachers can talk to their department chairs
(if in a school that large), principals, and district curriculum directors
about quality professional development. Hammond
says on page 226:
Unlike
the typically ineffective one-shot workshops that proliferate, effective
professional development is sustained, ongoing, content-focused, and embedded
in professional learning communities where teachers work over time on problems
of practice with other teachers in their subject area or school.
What does this look like? It means not having veteran
teachers take Harry Wong’s First Day of School or Marzano Strategies that work
(for the 5th time). It could
also mean not having Social Studies and Foreign Language teachers taking MTI
courses or Scientific Reasoning.
Instead, give teachers opportunities to learn about quality teaching
practices: Socratic Seminar, Interactive Notebooks, Inquiry based lessons, etc
that will not just benefit their teaching content but their general teaching
practices. This is the key difference
between the US
and other nations, we teach our content first and skills second. The rest of the world finds more value in
skills and content second.
Teachers
can also work on increasing their professionalism within communities by
dressing professionally at work, representing their schools and communities
with pride and not talking down upon them within the community. Speaking within our teacher groups about
situations okay as long as we are practicing restraint, speaking poorly about
the district we work in while in the same town is not okay because this is
showing that as professionals we are not content and are lacking in school
pride.
What can we
learn from the rest of the world? As a teacher in Idaho,
I feel that I can learn how important it is to advocate for myself in my
schools. I need to advocate for quality professional
development for not just myself, but my department and my colleagues district
wide. I need to take the research from
these top performing districts to department collaborations and say what are we
already doing that is similar and what can we realistically start to do within
our department. It is not about making
huge changes overnight. It is about
making small meaningful changes that will aid our diverse struggling
school.
I am optimistic that we can compete in this global
educational world, we can start the change from “natural resources centered” to
communities that are seeing the need for “educationally centered” ways of
thought. We don’t need to start on a
national level, but instead start locally and see meaningful changes
there. We can start changing education,
one Wright Fellow at a time!
Mari I enjoy your optimism and your ideas for making the world of education better. You are right we may not be able to fix everything, but if we start small and make changes in our own location maybe they will continue to ripple outwards.
ReplyDeleteMari
ReplyDeleteFor professional development I like to think that smaller group or individual is better. For example, us working on our masters or groups of teachers in a school having weekly study groups or buildings starting Professional Learning Communities. Once our nation is "educationally centered," as you put it so well, we can move to a professional work schedule (11 month contract) that will provide us the time to devote to real professional development and collaboration.