As I read
the 1st two chapters of The Flat World and Education, I felt
it offered some insights about possible solutions of educational problems and
difficulties identified in the School – The Story of American Public
Education. I found that it
addressed some of the issues and misunderstandings I had regarding apathetic
attitudes towards education displayed by some people.
As a teacher,
I get frustrated and apathetic towards initiatives and quick fixes that do not
address educational issues. I can
sympathize with students who are dealing with multiple sub level teachers year
after year. When I am required to attend
workshops that are repetitive and do not meet my needs or interests, I tend to
zone out and not fully engage in the “learning”.
I hear over
and over people making a generalized statement that in a country as rich as ours
there should not be awful school buildings and educational situations. We have so many entities (federal, state,
local) that pull money and utilize it in many different directions. We are not cohesive in our direction of what
and how to spend educational funds. So ultimately
we have lots of money, being spent randomly across the educational
landscape. On the
drive back home we listened to the Harper School episodes on This American Life. The school was at the end of receiving five
years of extra funds. It sounds like a
lot had been done with the money ranging from facilities to supports for
students. One comment struck with me. Out
of all previous “reform” efforts in this and other poverty stricken schools,
this was the best one the interviewee had seen.
What was done differently than previous reform initiatives? What made it the best reform he had seen? What was reformed? The money was being pulled,
what had it helped with? Did it matter how much money the school received, could
it ever give these students higher educational opportunities? What was the goal of the reform? Did the
money really help address the core issues? Or was it just a symptom fix? I saw that in response to the show, donations
were being accepted to help support Harper.
I am very pleased about that (we are a nation full of caring
individuals), but it leaves me feeling overwhelmed. This one school is getting more help, but for
how much longer? What about all the other schools across our nation that are in
as much desperate need for resources? Until
our method of financing schools really makes schools equal, students in poverty
schools will know that they are not valued.
If others do not care about their situation, why would they not be
apathetic towards public education?
The issue of
cultures being stereotyped and tracked into certain educational paths would also
create an apathetic attitude. If you know
that no matter how hard you work to achieve, or if your other interests are not
acknowledged or respected, why would you care about that system and what it
values? Generally we usually work to achieve
more when interacting with people/systems that respects and support us as
individuals.
April,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your "zoning out" experience in Professional Development functions. This is something I often feel as well. As we have seen from other nations, if Professional Development is done right, then teachers gain valuable tools to use in their classrooms, if not we zone out and are not receptive to the idea of PD any more. I am excited to listen to the Harper story this week as it appears to be one that will connect reform, money and desire to change with education in the United States.