Chapter
9 Blog
“Now
I’m Depressed”
I was
flying high after reading about all the great things Finland, Korea, and
Singapore were doing in regards to providing equal education to all. Chapter 9
of the Flat World in Education really slammed me back down to earth hard. When
you think about how big the education system is in the United States and just
how big a train wreck it is, the task of meaningful reform seems impossible. A
famous U.S. Marine named Hammering Hank Halloran once said, “Impossible just
means it will take a little longer”. I believe that as long as education reform
is tied to political agendas and selling education continues to be profitable,
the goal of meaningful reform will stay just out of reach.
Linda
Darling-Hammond makes a number of excellent recommendations. One of my
favorites is that the State and District need to be accountable to students and
teachers for providing an equitable learning environment for all students. This
equitable environment encompasses many factors from quality facilities to
quality educators. I think, however, educators and policy makers have very
different views of what an equitable education is. I tell my students, and I’m
sure you have all heard it, “Fair is not everybody gets the same, fair is
everybody gets what they need”. Unfortunately our policy makers continue to be committed
to the carrot and stick or test and punish approach to education. As Linda
Darling-Hammond points out the test and punish model that came about with the
advent of No Chile Left Behind has ultimately resulted in lower U.S. test
scores.
Teachers
aren’t motivated by money. I couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve said that I
didn’t get into education to get rich. Teachers do however want to be paid at a
level that recognizes their status as a professional educator and a person of
value in society. If the way our society shows how much we value a person is by
how much we are willing to pay them then our society holds teachers in low esteem.
Actions speak louder than words. One example of how our society really doesn’t understand
teaching or teachers is what happened with last year’s fiasco with pay for
performance. Just like we predicted it broke down along socioeconomic lines
with the largest performance bonuses going to schools in more affluent areas
and schools in poorer areas getting nothing. The Meridian Schools District’s
teacher of the year did not get a performance bonus last year. Again actions
speak louder than words.
There
are a number of things I think we could do that would make a difference without
taking on the entire system. Whenever
contract negotiations roll around or it’s time to slash the budget the first
thing on the block is professional development days. We need a greater emphasis
on developing quality educators. Linda Darling-Hammond notes that teachers are
attracted and retained by successful systems where they are valued and
encouraged to continue to grow as educators. It seems to me that investment in
professional development would be more beneficial to educational success than
alternant routs to certification. For
proof that this is a sound investment we need only to look at the success of
Finland, Korea, and Singapore where 100 hours of professional development annually,
is the norm.
Another
idea I like is this notion of differential pay. As I noted earlier, teachers aren’t
motivated strictly by pay, but combined with other programs like increased
opportunities for professional development or carrier enhancement, differential
pay could attract and retain quality teachers in high needs areas.
We all
need to take a look at our individual teaching practices and strive for
improvement but until we take control of our profession we will always be at
the mercy of someone else’s agenda.
Well written! I couldn't agree more with you about the duty to provide an equitable education. It seems that the word "accountability" should go the other way as well. If teachers are being held accountable for student performance than the governments should be help accountable for the lack of equitable teaching environments.
ReplyDeleteBud,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with the idea of equity for teachers and for students. It is not just a matter of holding teachers and students accountable for test scores, but holding admin and districts accountable for the resources, time, etc given to those teachers and students so that success is possible. We also need to hold government responsible since they are the ones making laws that dictate how we do things in schools- the question remains, Who is going to hold them accountable? We the American populace should, but we are too tied to the R and D beside names on the ballot we cannot think for ourselves and that needs to change in order to have the accountability that we all desire. Nice Work!
Your comments about how society values educators got me thinking about a conversation, Barb, Bobbi Jean and I had on our way back to U of I. Barb brought up the fact that Montana pays its teachers very well. One reason is because of oil money. I would like to know if there are other factors – specifically value of the professional educator. Regardless of the reasons why they pay teachers more, an interesting thing is happening and I wonder what it will produce. Being a teacher in Montana is becoming very competitive job. If someone bigger and brighter than you comes along you will find yourself out of a job. What a great opportunity this presents for students! They will be taught by some of the best and the brightest in our profession. (Admittedly the living and social conditions of some of the small towns may not attract all the best and brightest.) I know there are many other factors that affect education, but one of the key components of students’ achievement are teachers. Here we have a state that may possibly have one of the strongest resources to improve students’ achievement. I am interested to see how this plays out.
ReplyDeleteI liked your comment about how we need to take control of our profession. I agree, but let me play devil’s advocate for a moment. How? How can we add one more hat to our already overloaded job. How can we dedicate time (much of it on our personal time) to teaching and all that entails and still find time to attend meetings, set up meetings, educate the community, write letters to the editor, letters to legislators, research, promote ideas, prove success that policy should be built on. Where is the time? I really don’t even have enough time to prepare to meet the needs of my students already. How will I find more time? In my little sphere, I have talked with concerned parents, I have written letters, but there is not time to do that job thoroughly. We need a PR group. Kim – I would love to hear your ideas on this. What does the IEA do? I feel like in my district they promote the basic “rights” of teachers, but are they out there promoting good teaching practices, models of success, PLCs, etc. I do not know very much about it – I should do my part to stay more informed. But I would like to know what does IEA promote for the profession of education. Are there other outlets that can get our voice to the legislature? Kim I am not anti IEA – I just want to know, are they working on critical policies for the good of the profession and our students?