So this week I listened to the episode of This American Life
that covered Harper High School in Chicago.
It was an education concerning gangs to be sure. I was really struck by the fact that the kids
didn’t have a choice as to whether or not they joined a gang. This is vastly different from the idea I had
living here, safe in my north Idaho bubble.
My vision of gangs was largely a product of the mid D.A.R.E. program and
exposure to other mid 90s anti-gang propaganda delivered to me at school. In this 90s model, as Ira Glass pointed out, gangs
are something you join and are initiated into, a conscious choice to choose evil. I think I imagined the joining of a gang to
be not unlike signing articles of piracy in the 17th century, you
know, candles, a dark room, guy with an eye patch and no teeth stands in the
background with some sort of blade in his hand.
The truth that kids are simply “in a gang” because of the block they
live on was astounding to me. It seems
that this being in a gang by default is something new because in the bit about
Terrance Green, Terrence’s father seemed to have the same view of gangs that I
did. In point of fact, he seemed unwilling
to accept that his son was a victim of something so large he couldn’t escape,
the new reality of gangs.
It is strange to me that even though most of the kids aren’t
in the gang because they want to be, the violence level is still high. I guess you have to play the part… Personally I can’t even imagine walking to
school, knowing that I have to cross through a neighborhood of enemy territory
where I might be shot simply because I am a male of age. I still can’t wrap my mind around that
concept. It sounds like something from a
post-apocalyptic sci-fi novel - marauding bands of territorial teenagers with
guns looking for someone to attack, tribal warlords vying for territory and
power. But this isn’t a Sci-FI novel, and there is no hero standing up to
them. Even the policeman they
interviewed seemed largely hopeless. I
have to wonder what the solution is, and at the same time I have to have a bit
of a dark chuckle at my own schools attempt to limit gang activity. We have policies like no wearing of bandanas
and other such rules that just seem silly in light of the reality the kids at
Harper face. As if bandanas were really
the issue, and as if there is anything even remotely close to Harper in north Idaho. I do have to say that if there were a gang
problem in north Idaho, the death toll would probably be much higher because kids
around here know how to shoot. I found
it fascinating, in a dark sort of way, that even though kids around Harper grow
up around guns, seem to be saturated with gun culture, they still can’t shoot
straight. The radio spot pointed this
out, and even said that kids prefer the 15 round clips because they have such a
hard time hitting anything. I think I
remember them saying too that most drive-bys are bloodless. It
makes me wonder if they are missing on purpose.
One of my friends from Germany, whose grandfather was forced to fly for
the Nazi’s during WWII, told me that his grandfather purposefully missed allied
planes because he didn’t want to kill anyone and he knew that the Nazis were
bad. He also knew that the Nazis would
kill him if he refused to go on missions.
Maybe this is a similar situation.
Tom I think you make a really good point that I had not considered before. Maybe they are missing on purpose because they really don't want to be in a gang and are forced to join. You are right when you say kids here know how to shoot. When we lived in Kamiah, my son and his friends brought rifles to school because they all went hunting when school let out for the day. Those kids are dead on shots and nobody ever thought a thing about it. In addition, it is almost laughable to see each districts attempts to curb gang activity because it really is not effective. On the other hand, maybe it does slow it down. I guess if it helps anyone then it is worth the time and effort.
ReplyDelete