I saw a quote several months ago and can’t remember the exact words, but it
was something along the lines that when we identify ourselves (‘us’) through labels
we commit violence, because by doing so, we, in turn, label others as ‘them’.
At first I was taken aback and dismissed it as a bit extreme. However, it was
enough of a brain irritant that I have been pondering it ever since and
grappling with how this person came to that viewpoint. I thought about it a lot
this past week during the readings and discussions in class. Then I wondered if/how
that may apply to how I label myself and the resulting impact on my relationships
with others. I wondered what divisions or violence I create when I use…Female. Heterosexual.
Married. 3 children. Lutheran. US citizen. Caucasian, not of Hispanic origin.
45-55. College educated. SpEd Teacher. Union president. Employed. Omnivore. Gay rights supporter.
In America’s nascent years, labels defined who had certain inalienable rights
and who didn’t. By labeling those who had rights, the ones who didn’t match
those labels fell into the ‘them’ category…one vote, 3/5 vote, or no vote at
all. The violence committed: alienation from the system that was supposed to
provide life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It stands to reason that
the education system, serving as the ‘feeder program’ to full participation in
society, may have been viewed very differently depending on the lenses a person’s
birthright afforded her/him.
As a student I went to fully integrated schools since kindergarten. I saw
the historical and legal transgressions as something from the past and not
relevant to the present. I couldn’t wrap my head around the struggle for civil
rights or the rise of organizations like NAACP, AIM, NOMAS, and others. It
annoyed and scared me when riots broke out in my home town and the courthouse
was vandalized. But then again, I also didn’t have a clue that my town had
red-lined neighborhoods with differing curfews depending on the color of your skin
while I was growing up. I was unaware that Aaron had grandparents at his home
who were born into sharecropper families and worked as small children. Wright’s
parents were held in a Japanese internment camp. Jonita’s parents went to a
mission school in Montana and Jonita was in town living away from her birth
family as part of a different mission program. These stories were revealed as we
went to school together. At school, I had the benefit to see myself reflected
in the teaching staff and the reading material and come home at the end of the day.
I bought into this system that said “anything is possible”. It wasn’t a
question for me. However, many of my classmates didn’t have the same benefit.
This systematic alienation through US history was driven home saliently for
me, as a young adult, when I attended the 90th birthday party for Isabel, a tribal elder. As we talked I learned that she liked the shirt
I was wearing, that she had grandchildren I worked with, that she was 14 when
Chief Joseph died, and that she remembered him walking around Nespelem. That
conversation turned out to be an all-out challenge to any residual thinking I
may have had about history as something disconnected to the present. On that
day, Safeway birthday cake on plastic plates collided with tule mat houses and tepees, the US Calvary, and Nez Perce people trying to make their way to Canada. My world was
rocked in a way it hadn’t been before…and opened up.
How does that relate to education today? Many students that are in the
education system now, go home to families who were educated in a way that sold
them and/or their loved ones incredibly short, sometimes for generations. The legacy of
pain and alienation is very present and real. We have an opportunity in this.
I don’t believe our school system will ever get rid of categorizing people
by gender, race, age, free & reduced lunch, or special needs. It is how we
try to measure where we are succeeding and where we aren’t. But, if we can
shift the ‘us v them’ paradigm to simply ‘us’, we might be able to create a
system that can increase our success rate for all. I am not advocating a
melting pot ‘us’. I believe that model strips away uniqueness and demands conformity at a high price.
As a teacher, I need to be authentic about who I am and aware of my own
blind spots that my experiences bring to working with a diverse community of
students and families. I need to make sure my materials reflect the students
who are in the class, as well as expose them to different cultures and new ways
of thinking about the world around them. I can’t do this with ‘drive-by’
culture lessons of Native Americans solely in relationship to Thanksgiving, African
Americans during Black History Month, Mexican Americans during the week of
Cinco de Mayo, or ‘Christmas around The World’. These methods usually present
culture and diversity as separate from the rest of the curriculum…which just changes the way
alienation is packaged. I believe diversity needs to be interwoven throughout the
curriculum, in the staff, and a natural part of the educational conversation
whenever possible to best serve students. The process and conversations surrounding
diversity won’t always be easy if they are approached with honesty, but they are
potentially very fruitful.
Hi Lynnette,
ReplyDeleteThe idea of changing "us vs. them" to simply "us" struck me as being very similar in philosophy to recent PLC ideas of looking at students in a grade level or an entire school even as "ours" rather than "your students" or "my students". The idea being the same as you stated in that it raises the success for all when we are all working together and including everyone.